By Teresa Gutierrez
Washington, D.C.
Mar 24, 2010

On March 21 a multitude of immigrants and their supporters amassed in the largest demonstration for immigrant rights in Washington, D.C., in decades, if not ever.

There were at least 200,000 people at the biggest immigrant-rights rally in this country since 2006. The crowd was overwhelmingly Latino/a, but pockets of Koreans, Filipinos, Africans and Muslim immigrants and families were also there in proud attendance.

Photo: Heather Cottin

People traveled from as far away as Colorado, Texas and California. Homemade signs called on President Barack Obama to keep his promises for immigration reform and urged the government to stop dividing families.

The intentions of the main organizers of this historic demonstration for immigrant rights may have been complex and varied. But the world should make no mistake about it: Every single person who came to the demonstration was there to demand legalization.

Furthermore, they were confident that immigrants have earned legalization over and over — and are not asking but are demanding it.

It was reported that the huge size of the crowd was in large part due to the money that poured in from unions tied to the Democratic Party as well as from the Democratic Party itself. In fact one of the rally speakers was a representative of MoveOn.org.

Washington, D.C., March 21.

Washington, D.C., March 21

Nonetheless, it was an encouraging day that especially made Latinos/as proud as the crowd over and over again chanted, “Si se puede!” (Yes, we can!)

When it was announced that President Obama would be addressing the rally, the crowd roared in approval.

Obama’s intervention indeed made it one of the most interesting developments in this country since his election. In fact, this writer has never been to a progressive protest rally where a U.S. president has spoken.

While immigrants and their advocates may be buoyed by the huge turnout, it was also a day of concern and apprehension for anyone who is looking deeper into this issue.

photo: Dante Strobino

Unfortunately, most of the speakers at the rally, including President Obama, repeated the demand for “comprehensive immigration reform.” This formulation has regrettably become a cover for a policy that is fraught with danger.

Obama endorsed the reform bill being proposed by Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Although the most progressive wing of the immigrant-rights movement has not made a full analysis of the Schumer bill since it was just recently introduced, preliminary assessments are that it may be like the thoroughly reactionary Sensenbrenner bill called by another name.

For example it calls for a biometric ID system for all U.S. workers. This will be ominous for the entire working class and it may push the undocumented further underground.

In the next few weeks, the most progressive wing of the movement will be addressing these bills. It will be figuring out the next steps of the movement in light of the historic March 21 demonstration.

But one thing is for sure. The March 21 demonstration confirms that May Day 2010 is more important than ever.

Immigrants and supporters are being told by many that “comprehensive immigration reform” — which means legalization for few and more militarization of society — is the best they are going to get. But history shows that militant action that represents the interests of the working class can win genuine gains.

The voices saying that legalization with no militarization is not realistic are the same voices who told women and Black people that they would never win the right to vote.

A mighty May Day 2010 that brings in not only immigrants but workers who want to fight for jobs, students who demand high-quality public education, youths who want education not jails or military recruitment, progressives fighting the wars abroad and all sectors is the kind of movement that can win the demands of the people, including legalization.

 
By Teresa Gutierrez
Published Mar 19, 2010 8:15 PM

On March 21, tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people will be demonstrating for immigrant rights in Washington, D.C.

The action arises from the frustration and deep anger that exist in the immigrant community and among their supporters that despite a nonstop demand for full rights for immigrants, especially legalization for the undocumented, such pleas have been ignored by Washington.

The huge March 21 demonstration will continue the massive outpouring of millions of workers in the spring of 2006, when immigrants poured out of the shadows and burst onto the scene, forever changing the political landscape in this country.

Immigrants and their supporters know that the undocumented have earned legalization. In fact, they have earned it a hundred times over.

Workers are forced to come to the very country — the U.S. — that has created the conditions back home that leave them no other option but to leave.

NAFTA, the U.S.-backed wars in Central America, agreements with migrant-exporting countries such as the Philippines, the ongoing intervention and occupation of Haiti, the coup in Honduras, the refusal to pay reparations for the historic plundering of Africa, are all examples of U.S. policies abroad that mean that millions must painfully leave their homelands in search of survival.

Then when workers arrive in the U.S. they are forced to work in the underground economy with absolutely no rights.

It is a perfect system for the capitalist class: a vulnerable, exploitable, expendable, cheap labor force that must serve the whims of the bosses.

Despite the mantra that is constantly stated that immigration policy is broken, it does indeed work. But it is working for the bosses and the bankers, not for the people.

The demonstration on March 21 and all efforts to win rights for immigrants are extremely important. But what will come out of this demonstration is equally important.

What kind of reform?

There is a widespread movement for what is called comprehensive immigration reform. It is important to continue to elaborate exactly what kind of immigration reform is needed. The movement — not just immigrants, but labor, the anti-war and all progressive movements — must demand immigration reform that is thoroughly pro-worker.

This kind of reform will lift the standard of living not only for immigrants but also for the whole working class.

This immigration reform must at least include:

• Immediate legalization for all the undocumented in this country

• An end of the militarization of the border, which is an act of war and fosters a xenophobia mentality

• Stopping the raids now and ending the division of families

•  Ending U.S. foreign policy that creates the conditions for migration such as support for the Honduran coup

•  Repealing U.S. trade policies like NAFTA

•  Jobs for all workers in this country regardless of place of birth

• Education for all regardless of place of birth or economic status

• No guest worker programs

• Recognition of the role climate change plays in creating refugees and policies to prevent it

It is clear where the Republican Party stands on the immigration question. While having nuances of differences here and there, overwhelmingly this party continues to maintain a vicious anti-immigrant position. The far-right inside and outside the party uses immigration as one of the issues to whip up a rabid right-wing campaign. It is racist and targets the first Black president in an inexcusable way.

In response to the massive organizing for the March 21 demonstration, an extreme anti-immigrant group called NumbersUSA held a press conference. At it, a member said, “ … the new welfare queen today is women coming from Mexico with a bunch of babies. We have babies, they have dependents.”

This is thoroughly anti-poor, no matter national origin or color. The Mexican woman is today’s target, but their rhetoric is aimed against all poor women.

While the position of the Republicans and the far-right is clear and easy to fight, it is not so clear with the Democrats.

Two major bills from Democrats are up for consideration in Congress. One is by New York Sen. Charles Schumer and the other from Illinois Rep. Luis Gutierrez. Gutierrez already introduced his bill in December 2009; Schumer has not yet done so.

Rep. Gutierrez’s bill is the more progressive. Gutierrez has been traveling around the country speaking to huge audiences about passing “comprehensive immigration reform.” His talks fill Latinos/as with pride about their background.

His 700-page-long bill is officially named the Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act. The acronym CIR ASAP is clever.

But the bill goes along with the argument that the immigration issue and therefore immigrants are part and parcel of the so-called “war on terror.” Whatever their personal beliefs, Democrats have not confronted this militaristic thinking.

They will not stand up and declare that the real terrorists are in the Pentagon and on Wall Street and calling the shots in Washington. They will not declare that the real terrors in society are the policies that shut down factories, evict people from their homes, violate the environment and so on.

Workers looking for survival are not terrorists. They are the victims of terror. Any immigration bill that has “enforcement” as its heart is an immigration bill that should be rejected.

Unfortunately, Democrats will tell the movement this is the best they can get. When immigration advocates asked Schumer to refrain from calling the undocumented “illegal aliens,” he refused. Schumer said that is the way it is.

The movement must decide

Throughout U.S. history, the capitalist class and the officials in Washington that do its bidding have always declared in one way or another, “That is the way it is.”

They will not point out that history shows just the opposite. When workers are in motion, when the movement is massive, what “is the way it is” can be radically changed from one day to the next.

Slavery was abolished when many said it would not be. Women won the right to vote when many said they could not. The war in Vietnam was ended due to the resistance of the people of Vietnam, but the movement in the U.S. was also instrumental.

Unemployment insurance, the 8-hour day and welfare were all gains that the people were able to wrest from the capitalist class. Nothing was given to us. All of it was won.

Legalization without enforcement and without a militarization of the border can be won.

But this can only happen if the people are fighting for their own interests independent of the Democrats. The Democratic Party has shown over and over again that it puts a brake on the struggle. It will only fight for band-aids, and it will never stand up to the powers that be, despite the good intentions of many individuals.

As hundreds of thousands march on Washington on March 21, they must keep this in mind. We must be vigilant in the days following that neither Schumer nor Gutierrez uses the momentum of the demonstration to back their bills. This would be opportunistic and a misinterpretation of the demonstrators who sacrificed to come to Washington.

Make no mistake about it: the masses in Washington on March 21 want legalization.

One way to assure that the demand for legalization prevails is to build the mobilizations for May Day 2010 around the country.

May Day is a signal to the ruling class that we are marching independent of the big business parties. May Day is a day when workers around the world march. It is a historic day that is filled with the spirit of class struggle.

This year’s May Day promises to be unique. In many areas around the country, it is attracting not just immigrants or immigrant rights activists. It is attracting more and more students, unions, organizations for the homeless, youth, anti-war organizations and organizations fighting for jobs or against foreclosures.

If united and militant, this is the kind of mobilization that can wrest what is rightfully ours, including legalization.

The author is co-coordinator of the New York May 1 Coalition for Immigrant Rights.

 

By Raúl Alcaraz, from Tohono O’odham lands

Southern Arizona

26 February 2010

www.antifronteras.com

With Arizona state-sponsored anti-Raza, anti-migrant bills being seriously proposed left and right, increasing militarization and genocide at the U.S./Mexico border-murderlands, kidnappings, disappearances and separations of families through the form of raids, detentions and deportations, times are proving that “government is best which governs not at all.”

We are living under siege in “low-intensity” warfare that has the potential to escalate. Modern-day government sponsored legal segregation terrorism is at its finest. Despite the differences, countless folks have already compared the current migrant struggle to that of U.S.-based African folks during the Civil Rights and Black Liberation movements of the 1960’s and 70’s. There are many parallels in the oppression we face but not in resistance tactics. (Let me save that point for another “message”!)

But today, the Right Wing is right, very right! This is NOT our country, this is not our government, and these are not our institutions. I know it’s a slippery slope so don’t get it twisted, I am NOT proposing that we all get deported! But let’s take a look back at herstory. This country, this government, these institutions were not built by “immigrants” alone (as many signs declare in street marches), they were built on the bloodshed of our Native, African and migrant ancestors combined. Our blood still stains capitol and Wall Street towers, our sweat, blood and tears can be found in southwestern railroads, modern highways and endless agricultural fields across the land; bloodshed is splattered on concrete, on asphalt, on land, on dirt, on the very earth that sustains the riches of this country called the United States of America. So the Right is right: the KKK, the Minutemen, the politicians, la Migra, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Joe Arpaio—they’re all right, none of this is ours; it was never meant for people like you or me to begin with. So why are we begging to get our share of the American apple pie? Why are we trying to reform colonization/slavery/capitalism? As W.E.B. Du Bois would ask us, do we really believe we can reform the same systems that were created to oppress us?

What is ours is ancient and thousands of years old. Our indigenous ancestors migrated throughout these lands WITHOUT BORDERS thousands of years before any Niña, Pinta, Santa Maria or Mayflower ever dreamt of crossing the Atlantic Ocean. Colonization crossed us, the border crossed us and now we are living on occupied lands. The occupation is their dream; it’s a colonial dream. European settlers landed, invaded, took over lands and set up their own systems. Occupation is a bloody thing as it imposes a foreign system on Native people. This is why today in 2010 Native land is still filled with their systems of oppression: their school system, their universities, their history books, their city councils, their supervisors, their mayors, their governors, their president, their congress, their senate, their constitution, their electoral system, their Democrat and Republican parties, their stores, their malls, their corporations, their CEO’s, their jobs, their money, their economic system, their hospitals, their religion, their churches, their marriage institutions, their real estate, their media, their police, their courts, their jails, their migra, their detention centers, their checkpoints, their immigration system, their citizenship papers, their borders, their army, their weapons, their tanks, their wars. The list can go on of things THEIRS NOT OURS. This country was/is built by us but NOT for us. That’s why hundreds of years later, poor people and people of color are still segregated, still discriminated, still terrorized, still left on the margins of great white wealth.

Yes, we still live here and participate in this system, mostly because there is no other alternative, right? So what do we do? The question is overwhelming with over 500 years of political, economic and social context. Malcolm X and Zapatista principles come to mind: self-respect, self-defense and self-determination… But a proposal more specific and concrete than that? That is our responsibility to figure out as a community. We need to get creative, innovative and consult with community and seek guidance from elders and other liberation social movements that have used different methods of struggle. For now, all I propose is that we recognize the historical and current context of occupation and that we not become trapped or limited within colonial frameworks when developing visions and strategies for social change. Their system should not be the “end all/be all” of our visions for a better world. If we limit ourselves to the confines of their system, we have already lost from the very beginning and we ourselves will continue upholding the very same colonial structures we proclaim to defy. Like Audre Lord once declared: “We cannot take down the Master’s house with the Master’s tools.” We must stop defining ourselves and the Migrant Rights Movement on foreign ways of being, on their system, on the continuing occupation of our minds, bodies, hearts and souls.

We must reclaim/transform language and our points of view. The current debate on “borders” and “immigration reform” even from the so-called pro-migrant camp comes from a colonial framework that lacks a social justice vision and never challenges borders or citizenship. Instead, the migrant rights movement Hispanic/White liberal establishment negotiates and collaborates with colonization and occupation.

With U.S. government-sponsored immigration raids, detentions, deportations, and genocide of our people and corporate interests increasing unemployment, poverty, imperialist wars and inaccessible health care at global levels, times are proving that “government [and corporations are] best which govern not at all.”

Let’s take it all back! ¡YA BASTA!

¡Un abrazo fuerte a tod@s mis compañer@s en la lucha!
Raúl Alcaraz, from Tohono O’odham lands
Southern Arizona
26 February 2010


Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '&' in /home/content/m/a/y/may1st/html/wp-content/themes/suffusion/footer.php on line 18